The skill of silat Class E men (MAS) using techniques Sweep, Topple and kick and how Class H men (MAS) lose in final Sea GAMES 2015
Shapie .M .N .M. (1,2) & Junior .R .R. (1)
- Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Rekreasi Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor
- Pertubuhan Seni Gayung Fatani Malaysia
- USKU Persatuan Karate W.P Labuan
ABSTRACT
The
purpose of this study is to describe the skills used between winner match of
Pencak Silat Class A and E Men during Sea Games in Singapore 2015. A video
recording during the match was used for the analysis. The skills were coded
into categories which are punches, kick, sweep, Topple down. By using sample
t-test used to analyses the data between winner and loser. Result shows that
the winner used kicking, sweep and topple down techniques compared to the
loser.
keywords: kicking, martial arts, coaching, performances analysis
keywords: kicking, martial arts, coaching, performances analysis
INTRODUCTION
Silat is widely known through much
of South East Asia, the term pencak silat is used mainly in Indonesia. Pencak
silat was chosen as a unifying term for the Indonesian fighting styles. It was
a compound of the two most commonly used words for martial arts in Indonesia.
Pencak was the term used in central and east Java, while silat was used in
Sumatra and Borneo. In Minang usage, pencak and silat are seen as being two
aspects of the same practice. Pencak is the essence of training, the outward
aspect of the art which a casual observer is permitted to witness as
performance. Silat is the essence of combat and self-defense, the true fighting
application of the techniques.
Silat can improve in self-defenses
and it can be learned to use in competing a game which is it involve exciting,
fun, and motivating for athlete. It creates involvement of the athletes in the
class, larger excitement to improve and study new advanced skills, and
motivating the athletes or the student in perform better in class.
There
is a lot of motion analysis of silat including punch, kick, block, sweep,
topple, and dodge. Previous study has been studied about the activity profile
during action time. According to Mohamed Shapie, Oliver, O’Donoghue, and Tong (2013)
the nature of work periods within any combat sports depends on the frequency,
volume and type of the activity being performed. The objective of this study is
to describe the skills involved between the winner and loser as well as to
determine the factor that influences the winner to win.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A
video recording of quarterfinal, semifinal, and final match Class E Men
Malaysia during Sea Games in Singapore 2015 was used for the analysis also
final match Class H men Malaysia. There are three rounds within one match and
each round has two minute for fighting and one minute for resting. The skills
were coded into five categories which is punch, kick, sweep, topple and block.
In order to get accurate measurement of the skills, the video was repeated so
that the data can be taken properly. The frequency was taken as data to be
analyses.
MOTION CATEGORIES
Punch:
The punch ‘tumbuk’ attack is done by a hand with a closed fist hitting the
target
Kick:
The kick ‘tendang / terajang’ is an attacking movement which is performed with
one leg or two legs simultaneously a kick can be aimed at any target
Block:
The blocking movements using arms, elbows and legs with the purpose to block
off or striking back at any attack
Catch:
The catch ‘tangkapan’ is done by using the hand to obstruct the opponent from
carrying out an attack.
Topple:
There are various ways of toppling down one’s opponent. For example, a silat
exponent ‘pesilat’ can either push or shove
Sweep:
Swiping ‘sapuan’ involves attacking an opponent leg.
STATISICAL ANALYSIS
MALAYSIA VS INDONESIA
(CATEGORY MEN’S CLASS E) QUATERFINALS
ACTION
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
HIT
TARGET
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|||||
COUNTRY
|
M
|
I
|
M
|
I
|
M
|
I
|
M
|
I
|
|
Block
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
Block &
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Block & Kick
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||
Block &
Sweep
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|||||
Catch
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
|
Evage/Dodge
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|||||
Fake Punch
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Fake Kick
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
||
Kick
|
3
|
2
|
10
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
16
|
12
|
|
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
8
|
|||
Self-release
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||
Sweep
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||
Topple
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
||||
Total
|
6
|
6
|
26
|
18
|
11
|
22
|
42
|
47
|
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
MAS
|
3
|
14.6667
|
10.26320
|
5.92546
|
IND
|
3
|
15.3333
|
8.32666
|
4.80740
|
|
MALAYSIA
VS SINGAPORE (CATEGORY MEN’S CLASS E) SEMIFINALS
ACTION
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
HIT
TARGET
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|||||
COUNTRY
|
M
|
S
|
M
|
S
|
M
|
S
|
M
|
S
|
|
Block
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
Block
& Punch
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
||||||
Block
& Kick
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
7
|
2
|
|||
Block
& Sweep
|
|||||||||
Catch
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
||||
Evage/Dodge
|
3
|
3
|
|||||||
Fake
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Fake
Kick
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||
Kick
|
3
|
6
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
9
|
10
|
17
|
|
Punch
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
1
|
3
|
10
|
||
Self-release
|
|||||||||
Sweep
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
||||
Topple
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
|||
Total
|
7
|
11
|
24
|
12
|
10
|
15
|
41
|
38
|
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
MAS
|
3
|
13.6667
|
9.07377
|
5.23874
|
SIN
|
3
|
12.6667
|
2.08167
|
1.20185
|
|
MALAYSIA
VS VIETNAM (CATEGORY MEN’S CLASS E) FINAL
ACTION
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
HIT
TARGET
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|||||
COUNTRY
|
M
|
V
|
M
|
V
|
M
|
V
|
M
|
V
|
|
Block
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||
Block
& Punch
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||
Block
& Kick
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||
Block
& Sweep
|
|||||||||
Catch
|
10
|
1
|
5
|
15
|
1
|
||||
Evage/Dodge
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Fake
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Fake
Kick
|
4
|
9
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
7
|
|||
Kick
|
2
|
5
|
7
|
9
|
4
|
12
|
13
|
26
|
|
Punch
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
15
|
||||
Self-release
|
|||||||||
Sweep
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
1
|
||||
Topple
|
7
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
9
|
3
|
|||
Total
|
2
|
15
|
28
|
22
|
17
|
22
|
47
|
59
|
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
MAS
|
3
|
15.6667
|
13.05118
|
7.53510
|
VIE
|
3
|
19.6667
|
4.04145
|
2.33333
|
|
MALAYSIA
VS INDONESIA (CATEGORY MEN’S CLASS H) FINAL
ACTION
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
HIT
TARGET
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|||||
COUNTRY
|
M
|
I
|
M
|
I
|
M
|
I
|
M
|
I
|
|
Block
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||
Block
& Punch
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
||||
Block
& Kick
|
|||||||||
Block
& Sweep
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||
Catch
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
|||
Evage/Dodge
|
|||||||||
Fake
Punch
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||
Fake
Kick
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
||||
Kick
|
12
|
8
|
14
|
15
|
6
|
1
|
32
|
24
|
|
Punch
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
12
|
1
|
2
|
7
|
18
|
|
Self-release
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||
Sweep
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|||||
Topple
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
||||
Total
|
18
|
14
|
30
|
42
|
14
|
10
|
62
|
66
|
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
score
|
MAS
|
3
|
20.6667
|
8.32666
|
4.80740
|
IND
|
3
|
22.0000
|
17.43560
|
10.06645
|
|
DISCUSSION
Table
has shown the total actions done by the athlete according to the coding. Based
on the table, the winner (MAS) Class E is not using punching technique at all
but using kicking technique to fight the opponent also the use sweep and Tople.
Meanwhile, the loser is often using punching technique. The percentage of
punching technique by the winner is 0.0% compared to the loser team. The
percentage of kicking technique by the winner is high compared to the loser.
Even though the loser has higher percentage of kicking technique than the
winner, but according to the frequency table, the loser has higher percentage
in winning but because of he cannot complete the kicking to fight the opponent
as the opponent used blocking technique to protect himself. Based on the
analysis, the winner used a good strategy to fight the opponent by seeing the
weaknesses of the opponent and the loser has no opportunity to fight back if
the winner uses kicking technique with sweep. Based on the video, kick with
sweep technique is the best motion to topple down the loser. All in all, this
shows the factors that influence the winner to win the match. But in the other
hand video of class H (MAS) he have low of percentage in winning the fight
between Indonesia was tight if he can perform better MAS could win in the class
H division in the future the athlete of class H need to learn how to block,
catch, sweep, punch, kick sharply so the opponent don’t have the chance to
interfere the game.
CONCLUSION
In
conclusion, class E men Al Jufferi Jamari (MAS) performed a very good
performance he can completed his technique perfectly in the use of kick, sweep,
and topple. At Singapore Sea games 2015 However, in class H Muhammad Robial Sobri the fighter is smarter but in performance
he can’t complete the task because of the confidence in the skill, MAS lose to
IND. The Indonesia is very good in terms of application of skills during
fighting. The loser cannot win this match because he often loses the
opportunity to kick, punch, sweep or topple because he cannot apply the
technique when he try attacking the opponent. In addition, based on the video,
the winner used block, kick, sweep technique to fight back as well as topple
down the loser.
RECOMMENDATION
In my opinion the coach should
recognize the ability and capability of the National silat player and accepted,
they trained so in the future they are more athletes just like Al Jufferi
Jamari although some the athlete cannot perform doesn’t mean they should give
up because they need to rise up and fight for the country. However, it is
important also to the coach before making any decision in selecting athlete
whether the athlete should played in their own category. In advanced athletes should practice more on their target and technique in
improve their performance especially on catch, dodge, punch, kick, sweep, and
topple. As we know some of the athletes is lack in using the block and punch
they always go for the sweep or topple, we must train longer to improve the
technique and the most important thing is the strength of the athlete so they
cannot easily sweep or topple. Furthermore, video analysis can be a guidance to
identify the athlete’s mistake also the strengths of the athlete so in the
future can improved more.
REFERENCE
- 1. Mohamed Shapie, M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2013). Activity profile during action time in national silat competition. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 4(1), 75-79. doi: 10.5604/20815735.1073630
- 2. Shapie, M. N. M., & Elias, M. S. (2016). Silat: The curriculum of seni silat malaysia. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 11(2s), 122. doi: 10.18002/rama.v11i2s.4202
- 3. Shapie, M. N. M., Oliver, J., and, P. O. D., & Tong3, R. (2013). <activity_during_action_time_in_internati.Pdf>.
- 4. olahraganewongedan.blogspot.my/2015/12/sejarah-dan-gerak-dasar-pencak-silat.html
- 5. Widiastuti, W. (2014). Using game approach in improving learning outcomes of pencak silat. Asian Social Science, 10(5), 168.
- 6. Abidin, N. Z., & Adam, M. B. (2013). Prediction of vertical jump height from anthropometric factors in male and female martial arts athletes. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 20(1), 39.
- 7. Stark, S. (2008). Pencak silat pertempuran: Stepping from stone to stone: Sean Stark.
- 8. (Shapie & Elias, 2016)
- 9. (Shapie & Elias, 2016)
- 10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltwEbsqToY0
- 11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZVRSn_Vq68
- 12. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGK1CSVk0qs
- 13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L62CI3MJ-8A
- 14. Jähnichen, G. (2016). Silat: Observations from stong (kelantan) and from kuala penyu (sabah).
- About author
- This article was submitted by rodrigues robert junior an expert of martial arts performance analysis, you find these article useful?
- Email: Rodrigues679499@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment